Hubbard presents a condensed version of the last four chapters complete with a mathematical equation for the potential value of an individual.
The summary with a description of the four dynamics for survival: sex, self, mankind, and group. As I have just written about them here, I will not go over them again.
Hubbard then lists the "fundamental axioms of Dianetics". It would be worth reproducing these in full, but they cover 4 pages. I will instead quote the important ones and briefly address most the others, reminding you of my previous interpretations in brackets.
The Fundamental Axioms of Dianetics
Man's "dynamical principle of existence is survival." [This was an unsupported assertion.]
There are four dynamics to survival! : sex, self, mankind, and the group. [These were said to fit some "equation" that was never presented. It is my belief that Hubbard mostly likely found these to be a solution to a thought experiment (I use experiment very loosely here.) and not scientific equations.] The absolute goal of survival is immortality or infinite survival.
[This again is just an assertion.] ...the purpose of perceptions, retention, concluding and resolving problems is to direct its own organism and symbiotes and other organisms and symbiotes along the four dynamics toward survival.
[The definition of engram was very muddled and the existence of engrams was asserted, not proven.]
...
The dynamics ["the tenacity of life and vigor and persistence in survival"] are inhibited by engrams, which lie across them and disperse life force.
Intelligence is inhibited by engrams which feel! false or improperly graded data into the analyzer ["the analy! tical mi nd"]
The analytical mind thinking is terms of comparisons; the reactive mind "things only in identities"; and the somatic mind "places solutions into effect on the physical level. [arbitrary definitions]
Engrams cause aberrations. Psychosomatic ills are caused by engragms [which are the only source of aberrations].
[Proof is needed.]
Engrams are only received when unconscious. The engram is a moment of "unconsciousness" containing physical pain or the painful emotion and all perceptions, and is not available to the analytical mind as experience.
[See above brackets.]
And most interestingly, The
of an individual or a group may be expressed by the equation
The worth of an individual is computed in
terms of the alignment, on any dynamic, of his potential value with optimum survival along that dynamic. A high PV may, by reversed vector [Vector is defines as "a physical quantity with both magnitude and direction, such as a force of velocity". The phrase "by reversed vector" is meaningless.], result in a negative worth as in some severely aberrated persons. A high PV on and dynamic assures a high worth only in the unaberrated persons. This equation is what I would like to focus on for the remainder of this post as there are a number of points to address. First of all, there are no units mentioned in w! hich to measure any of the variables. What are potential value! , intell igence and dyamic measured in? Engrams? More importantly, what is x? It is an entirely undefined variable. Is x the worth a man or species? If it is, why does worth only increase dynamic and not intelligence, or are there missing parentheses? Also, how does high PV make worth both negative and positive according the this equation? Which variable accounts for aberrations? This equation is beyond meaningless. It's only purpose on the page is so Hubbard can point to it and say how he's scientific because there is a mathematical equation in his book. It's pathetic, scientifically pathetic.
Words defined: analyzer, attenuate, vector
Next: Book 2: Chapter 1: The Analytical Mind and the Standard Memory Banks
Note: All quotes are from
Hubbard, L. Ron.
Question for the Reader: I would like to take this moment to ask if you, the reader would like to see anything different from these posts. The next chapters are much longer than these of the introductory book, and with the next semester starting soon, I will not be able to keep up the pace and detail of these previous posts. Also, I believe Dianetics has amply demonstrated it's absurdity. The following chapters are much more detailed, and it seems it will take me some research into neurology and psychology to be able to fully address Hubbard's claims. I guess what I am asking is, are you enjoying these summaries, and do you think it's worth my time to continue? There is still a long way to go. Thanks for sticking with me!
all but my life chapter summaries
No comments:
Post a Comment